-
Amit Gvaryahu deposited REVIEW OF BENJAMIN PORAT, JUSTICE FOR THE POOR: THE PRINCIPLES OF WELFARE REGULATIONS, FROM BIBLICAL LAW TO RABBINIC LITERATURE in the group Textual Scholarship on Humanities Commons 2 years, 5 months ago
Benjamin Porat’s Justice for the Poor differs from these books not only in that it is written in Hebrew (from the list above, only Wilfand’s 2014 book has been translated into Hebrew), but also because it envisions rabbinic charity as a branch of “law.” Porat is a law professor, and his book is jointly published by a law school, a think tank and a legal publisher. Porat thus stretches the mantle of “Jewish Law” over an area which many might consider a pious or religious practice, but not a legal issue. This stretching has a distinguished pedigree: rabbinic scholars throughout the Middle Ages wrote treatises and responsa dedicated to the “laws of charity” just as they did with the “laws of the Sabbath” and the “laws of matza and leaven.”
Porat characterizes his book as a work of legal theory, an attempt to explain the “internal halakhic-legal logic of various laws” (16). In so doing, he sidesteps textual criticism (17), comparative legal thinking (17) and historical reasoning (18) as having any significant bearing on his analysis. Porat instead offers to his readers “contemporary conceptual distinctions, to illuminate the meanings that can be inferred from Pentateuchal and rabbinic sources.”