In this study, we assess differences in student performance between community college students who had and had not participated in our library’s “Research Basics” instructional badging program. We combine quantitative and qualitative assessment of student performance.

When given prompts for two hypothetical research assignments, students selec…[Read more]

In this study, we assess differences in student performance between community college students who had and had not participated in our library’s “Research Basics” instructional badging program. We combine quantitative and qualitative assessment of student performance.

When given prompts for two hypothetical research assignments, students selec…[Read more]

In this study, we assess differences in student performance between community college students who had and had not participated in our library’s “Research Basics” instructional badging program. We combine quantitative and qualitative assessment of student performance.

When given prompts for two hypothetical research assignments, students selec…[Read more]

In this study, we assess differences in student performance between community college students who had and had not participated in our library’s “Research Basics” instructional badging program. We combine quantitative and qualitative assessment of student performance.

When given prompts for two hypothetical research assignments, students selec…[Read more]

This is a table of connections between Universal Design for Learning checkpoints and the Quality Matters Rubric specific review standards. This table accompanied a conference talk given at at the 2023 QM Connect and 2024 Quality in Action conferences.

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approaches allow instructors to anticipate the needs of any learner. At our institution we have begun modeling design principles that follow UDL guidelines to foster flexible and inclusive learning environments. This presentation connects UDL approaches to QM™ Review Standards, demonstrates the concrete…[Read more]