The aim of the Russian Music Theory Interest Group (SMT-Rus) is to discuss, promote, and engage with Russian theoretical traditions, which offer new approaches to musical meaning, harmony, voice leading, and form, with a special emphasis on topics little studied by Western scholars, including functional modality and tonal mutability. This interest group was inaugurated at the 2013 meeting of the Society for Music Theory in Charlotte, NC.

Phrase terminology in Russian textbooks on form

1 reply, 2 voices Last updated by Ellen Bakulina 5 years, 8 months ago
Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #27888

      Yosef Goldenberg
      Participant
      @yosefgoldenberg

      Hello everyone. Is this the first discussion on the new site?

      I teach forms and analysis for beginners. The teacher of a parallel group uses Russian terminology and theory, and I see that we are not at all matching, e.g. what he teaches as “phrase” is more-or-less equivalent to Caplin’s “basic idea”; and for him “period” need not have a structure of question and answer. I have noticed that in Schoenberg too – examples for “period” include cases that fit Caplin’s “inverted period” /Webster’s “anti-period”.

      I have access to Russian textbooks on form – Tulin, Mazel, Bobrovsky – but I hardly read Russian. I ask for direct references with page numbers /example numbers – 1. Succinct definitions of phrase, period and sentence (if available); 2. Examples of open periods. I have found modulatory periods called “open periods” – this classification is worth rethinking! – but I look now for open but non-modulatory periods. [not including modulatory periods].

      I am also interested to find out specific German sources of this terminology.

      Thanks in advance

      Yosef Goldenberg

    • #27931

      Ellen Bakulina
      Participant
      @ellenbakulina

      Hi Yosef, indeed this is the first discussion, thanks for posting!

      I recently explored the Mazel/Zuckerman textbook _Analiz muzykal’nykh proizvedeniy_ (Analysis of musical works), Moscow 1967, so I’ll give you some things from there. One good place to start is the section titled “Period,” which begins on p. 550 of the edition I have. For details, see three levels of hierarchy, from big to small: predlozhenie (=sentence, which is like the German Satz: both are used in the sense of the periodic antecedent and consequent), fraza (phrase), and motif. All this is introduced on p. 550. “Sentences” (predlozheniya) are described more closely  on p. 551. On 552, a long discussion of the motive begins. A motive can have only one strong beat (I think this comes from Riemann). Together with the motive, they also mention “intonatsiya” (intonation), p. 562.

      P. 563 is where the phrase comes in. A phrase has two strong beats (that is, two measures), so it’s typical to have two motives in a phrase. I think this is where your colleague might have borrowed the concept of phrase that you are describing: it is essentially synonymous with Bill Caplin’s “idea” (like basic idea and contrasting idea). M and Z also say that “old textbooks” (I don’t know what they are!) call the phrase a “dvutakt.” Dvutakt means two measures.

      Hope this helps! I’ll be curious to hear other answers to Yosef’s question

       

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.