<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Knowledge Commons | Meili Steele | Activity</title>
	<link>https://hcommons.org/members/steelem/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://hcommons.org/members/steelem/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Meili Steele.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 18:43:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">11af356b2a343a85dfceafe68a4a1b51</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Discursive Incarceration: Black Fragility in a Divided Public Sphere</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900399/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 16:15:34 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abstract: The expression of fragility has always been a difficult and complex matter for African Americans, for the discourse of mainstream media is set up to sustain their fragility while at the same time misrecognizing it. Even though the black public sphere split off from the dominant public sphere after the Civil War to enable distinctive&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1900399"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900399/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1df6d9aa8c768f0e268116565270ce06</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Ontologie linguistique et dialogue politique chez Bakhtine in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884711/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 03:32:52 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The essay examines the strengths and weakness of Bakhtin's dialogical ontology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0f5b132450818982d4144b09f2078388</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Ontologie linguistique et dialogue politique chez Bakhtine in the group Literary theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884710/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 03:32:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The essay examines the strengths and weakness of Bakhtin's dialogical ontology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f53e06b962039e6b37e7f16a4d92be16</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Three Problamtics of Linguistic Vulnerability: Gadamer, Benhabib, and Butler in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884692/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 03:31:22 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three Problematics of Linguistic Vulnerability: Gadamer, Benhabib, and Butler<br />
Debates in feminist political philosophy often focus on what problematic(s) to use in order to understand normative ideals, gendered differences, and their histories. For the purposes of this chapter, I will contrast two important problematics in these debates, the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1884692"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884692/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">30e5c0408715616fef5b04c2605deaa1</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Three Problamtics of Linguistic Vulnerability: Gadamer, Benhabib, and Butler in the group Literary theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884690/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 03:30:58 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three Problematics of Linguistic Vulnerability: Gadamer, Benhabib, and Butler<br />
Debates in feminist political philosophy often focus on what problematic(s) to use in order to understand normative ideals, gendered differences, and their histories. For the purposes of this chapter, I will contrast two important problematics in these debates, the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1884690"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884690/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0a8def7852bb18af268dbda69cd242f3</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History: Habermas's Elision of Public Imagination in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884689/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 03:30:53 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiding from History: Habermas’s Model of Political Deliberation<br />
Meili Steele</p>
<p>Jürgen Habermas’s recent interventions in disputes about public history have served to underscore the failure of his philosophy to address an issue crucial to any democratic community: how to deliberate about one’s symbolic inheritance. His well-known immuni&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1884689"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884689/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">27bdd73f91d112402e5e0e6adcf4175f</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History: Habermas's Elision of Public Imagination in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884688/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 03:30:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiding from History: Habermas’s Model of Political Deliberation<br />
Meili Steele</p>
<p>Jürgen Habermas’s recent interventions in disputes about public history have served to underscore the failure of his philosophy to address an issue crucial to any democratic community: how to deliberate about one’s symbolic inheritance. His well-known immuni&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1884688"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884688/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f95984feac6bf959af4f6422b1e04e1</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History: Habermas's Elision of Public Imagination in the group Frankfurt School Critical Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884687/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 03:30:40 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiding from History: Habermas’s Model of Political Deliberation<br />
Meili Steele</p>
<p>Jürgen Habermas’s recent interventions in disputes about public history have served to underscore the failure of his philosophy to address an issue crucial to any democratic community: how to deliberate about one’s symbolic inheritance. His well-known immuni&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1884687"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884687/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0ef199a140796367ebb128989de1592a</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Ontologie linguistique et dialogue politique chez Bakhtine</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884432/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:40:16 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The essay examines the strengths and weakness of Bakhtin's dialogical ontology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">11703d225e441c598ca51a1233b469cf</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Three Problamtics of Linguistic Vulnerability: Gadamer, Benhabib, and Butler</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884328/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:30:46 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three Problematics of Linguistic Vulnerability: Gadamer, Benhabib, and Butler<br />
Debates in feminist political philosophy often focus on what problematic(s) to use in order to understand normative ideals, gendered differences, and their histories. For the purposes of this chapter, I will contrast two important problematics in these debates, the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1884328"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884328/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c6e5b425b0dee708182622f6ced789f5</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History: Habermas's Elision of Public Imagination</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884322/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:11:15 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiding from History: Habermas’s Model of Political Deliberation<br />
Meili Steele</p>
<p>Jürgen Habermas’s recent interventions in disputes about public history have served to underscore the failure of his philosophy to address an issue crucial to any democratic community: how to deliberate about one’s symbolic inheritance. His well-known immuni&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1884322"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1884322/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1b169e3af83c43d13ebc09e2aa5e2dc7</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History, Introduction, ch 3 in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683758/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:49:02 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book challenges an assumption at the heart of contemporary theoretical debates: that it is impossible to reason through history. Steele believes that two influential schools of contemporary thought “hide from history”: liberal philosophies of public reason as espoused by such figures as Jürgen Habermas, John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum and stru&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1683758"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683758/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6227d55b57da6ee389174f2207b88a7b</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History, Introduction, ch 3 in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683757/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:48:57 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book challenges an assumption at the heart of contemporary theoretical debates: that it is impossible to reason through history. Steele believes that two influential schools of contemporary thought “hide from history”: liberal philosophies of public reason as espoused by such figures as Jürgen Habermas, John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum and stru&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1683757"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683757/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ea4ad60886c77cc4d20b7142700cc293</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History, Introduction, ch 3 in the group Literary theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683756/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:48:51 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book challenges an assumption at the heart of contemporary theoretical debates: that it is impossible to reason through history. Steele believes that two influential schools of contemporary thought “hide from history”: liberal philosophies of public reason as espoused by such figures as Jürgen Habermas, John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum and stru&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1683756"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683756/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0b0fc2218e89f3dea56ff534b0c58742</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History, Introduction, ch 3 in the group Historiography</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683755/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:48:47 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book challenges an assumption at the heart of contemporary theoretical debates: that it is impossible to reason through history. Steele believes that two influential schools of contemporary thought “hide from history”: liberal philosophies of public reason as espoused by such figures as Jürgen Habermas, John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum and stru&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1683755"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683755/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2417a7fc53a0aec03fd4c55aad36c020</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History, Introduction, ch 3 in the group Frankfurt School Critical Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683754/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:48:45 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book challenges an assumption at the heart of contemporary theoretical debates: that it is impossible to reason through history. Steele believes that two influential schools of contemporary thought “hide from history”: liberal philosophies of public reason as espoused by such figures as Jürgen Habermas, John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum and stru&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1683754"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1683754/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">98e6bb97f13289361ab174ce68ab24d6</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Hiding from History, Introduction, ch 3</title>
				<link>https://mla.hcommons.org/activity/p/1683749/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:49:30 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book challenges an assumption at the heart of contemporary theoretical debates: that it is impossible to reason through history. Steele believes that two influential schools of contemporary thought “hide from history”: liberal philosophies of public reason as espoused by such figures as Jürgen Habermas, John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum and stru&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1683749"><a href="https://mla.hcommons.org/activity/p/1683749/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">445978eaf2294ffb1700baabde4ec06c</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Arendt versus Ellison on Little Rock: The Role of Language in Political Judgment in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640413/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 16:25:28 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few of Arendt's writings have drawn more criticism from her own supporters than "Reflections on LIttle Rock," in which she opposes the federally mandated desegregation of schools. I take Arendt's comments as a way of opening up problems in her conception of the relationship among political storytelling, plurality and judgment. I do this through a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640413"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640413/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">776e5e0edbdb62458648f3ba26f30839</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Arendt versus Ellison on Little Rock: The Role of Language in Political Judgment in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640412/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 16:25:25 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few of Arendt's writings have drawn more criticism from her own supporters than "Reflections on LIttle Rock," in which she opposes the federally mandated desegregation of schools. I take Arendt's comments as a way of opening up problems in her conception of the relationship among political storytelling, plurality and judgment. I do this through a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640412"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640412/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8da9559b4252d093e5c2824a01fca1fd</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Arendt versus Ellison on Little Rock: The Role of Language in Political Judgment in the group Literary theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640411/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 16:25:23 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few of Arendt's writings have drawn more criticism from her own supporters than "Reflections on LIttle Rock," in which she opposes the federally mandated desegregation of schools. I take Arendt's comments as a way of opening up problems in her conception of the relationship among political storytelling, plurality and judgment. I do this through a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640411"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640411/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89be63cf3fef418b5b04cc3d17f2b1c9</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Arendt versus Ellison on Little Rock: The Role of Language in Political Judgment in the group Frankfurt School Critical Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640410/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 16:25:21 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few of Arendt's writings have drawn more criticism from her own supporters than "Reflections on LIttle Rock," in which she opposes the federally mandated desegregation of schools. I take Arendt's comments as a way of opening up problems in her conception of the relationship among political storytelling, plurality and judgment. I do this through a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640410"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640410/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0db6aaa838213bdc79b556d189f26095</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Arendt versus Ellison on Little Rock: The Role of Language in Political Judgment</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640354/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:13:48 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few of Arendt's writings have drawn more criticism from her own supporters than "Reflections on LIttle Rock," in which she opposes the federally mandated desegregation of schools. I take Arendt's comments as a way of opening up problems in her conception of the relationship among political storytelling, plurality and judgment. I do this through a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640354"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640354/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7b93fcc3513b42391e3fad5dcd1f3ca4</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Social Imaginaries and the Theory of the Normative Utterance in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640130/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 16:25:41 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Charles Taylor to Marcel Gauchet, theorists of the social imaginary have given us new ways<br />
to talk about the shared structures of meanings and practices of the West. Theorists of this group<br />
have argued against the narrow horizons of meaning that are deployed by deliberative political<br />
theories in developing their basic normative concepts&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640130"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640130/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ab7be886615aed89ded8f7063d4e1857</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Social Imaginaries and the Theory of the Normative Utterance in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640129/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 16:25:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Charles Taylor to Marcel Gauchet, theorists of the social imaginary have given us new ways<br />
to talk about the shared structures of meanings and practices of the West. Theorists of this group<br />
have argued against the narrow horizons of meaning that are deployed by deliberative political<br />
theories in developing their basic normative concepts&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640129"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640129/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">74ee96f11ceb4b91a829a17de1ea8175</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Social Imaginaries and the Theory of the Normative Utterance in the group Literary theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640128/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 16:25:37 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Charles Taylor to Marcel Gauchet, theorists of the social imaginary have given us new ways<br />
to talk about the shared structures of meanings and practices of the West. Theorists of this group<br />
have argued against the narrow horizons of meaning that are deployed by deliberative political<br />
theories in developing their basic normative concepts&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640128"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640128/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b52a4cc5ec5c73b21282770b46cd4a27</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Social Imaginaries and the Theory of the Normative Utterance in the group Frankfurt School Critical Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640127/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 16:25:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Charles Taylor to Marcel Gauchet, theorists of the social imaginary have given us new ways<br />
to talk about the shared structures of meanings and practices of the West. Theorists of this group<br />
have argued against the narrow horizons of meaning that are deployed by deliberative political<br />
theories in developing their basic normative concepts&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640127"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640127/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4cede0de3e3f4e771ed7176c790ab2e3</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited The Philosophical Importance of Henry James's Late Style in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640126/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 16:25:33 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When speaking of the philosophical importance of James’s late style, critics and philosophers have taken two broad approaches. One route, exemplified by Martha Nussbaum, attributes this style to the sensitivity of the characters. The other, exemplified by Robert Pippin, attributes the writing’s complexity to the ambiguities of the moral codes dur&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640126"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640126/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">37ee9cce62901b625205b9e5367d3d5e</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited The Philosophical Importance of Henry James's Late Style in the group Literary theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640125/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 16:25:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When speaking of the philosophical importance of James’s late style, critics and philosophers have taken two broad approaches. One route, exemplified by Martha Nussbaum, attributes this style to the sensitivity of the characters. The other, exemplified by Robert Pippin, attributes the writing’s complexity to the ambiguities of the moral codes dur&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640125"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640125/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6ea149db0f8584f2c058b3b4431e543f</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited Social Imaginaries and the Theory of the Normative Utterance</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640080/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 19:28:00 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Charles Taylor to Marcel Gauchet, theorists of the social imaginary have given us new ways<br />
to talk about the shared structures of meanings and practices of the West. Theorists of this group<br />
have argued against the narrow horizons of meaning that are deployed by deliberative political<br />
theories in developing their basic normative concepts&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640080"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640080/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4ac3a1b8042f6c86c20b2929c4aec461</guid>
				<title>Meili Steele deposited The Philosophical Importance of Henry James's Late Style</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640079/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 19:14:47 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When speaking of the philosophical importance of James’s late style, critics and philosophers have taken two broad approaches. One route, exemplified by Martha Nussbaum, attributes this style to the sensitivity of the characters. The other, exemplified by Robert Pippin, attributes the writing’s complexity to the ambiguities of the moral codes dur&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1640079"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1640079/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>