<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Knowledge Commons | Cameron Neylon | Activity</title>
	<link>https://hcommons.org/members/cameronneylon/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://hcommons.org/members/cameronneylon/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Cameron Neylon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 06:08:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">86e6c0a45a64bebd2df44bb7a338aabb</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Research excellence is a neo-colonial agenda (and what might be done about it) in the group HuMetricsHSS</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1660931/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:28:40 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research “excellence” is a central target of policy, researchers and institutions. Increasingly it is a target of criticism for the way in which it reinforces systemic biases in power, reduces diversity, and excludes many participants from the processes of scholarship. In this chapter I argue that in the context of post- colonial and tra&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1660931"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1660931/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a71e5f73cf2aac192ce3c03d166f53b7</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Research excellence is a neo-colonial agenda (and what might be done about it) in the group Cultural Studies</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1660930/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:28:30 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research “excellence” is a central target of policy, researchers and institutions. Increasingly it is a target of criticism for the way in which it reinforces systemic biases in power, reduces diversity, and excludes many participants from the processes of scholarship. In this chapter I argue that in the context of post- colonial and tra&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1660930"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1660930/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0b87d2f3c3533efa38204412e31a931a</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Research excellence is a neo-colonial agenda (and what might be done about it)</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1660911/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:00:15 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research “excellence” is a central target of policy, researchers and institutions. Increasingly it is a target of criticism for the way in which it reinforces systemic biases in power, reduces diversity, and excludes many participants from the processes of scholarship. In this chapter I argue that in the context of post- colonial and tra&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1660911"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1660911/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2c45f609c1c1fe97d156f28eefd72ca4</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Arenas of Productive Conflict: Universities, peer review, conflict and knowledge in the group Cultural Studies</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1629714/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:25:54 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social theories of knowledge necessarily emphasise context and relativism. They are grounded in a specific situation or community. Where they seek to use such a grounding to approach a concept of general or objective knowledge they tend to either be unsatisfying in philosophical depth, or to turn on questions of the relative power of groups. In&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1629714"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1629714/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e0bd1223517be3b95627a5cf3f98bec2</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Arenas of Productive Conflict: Universities, peer review, conflict and knowledge</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1629661/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 01:11:53 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social theories of knowledge necessarily emphasise context and relativism. They are grounded in a specific situation or community. Where they seek to use such a grounding to approach a concept of general or objective knowledge they tend to either be unsatisfying in philosophical depth, or to turn on questions of the relative power of groups. In&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1629661"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1629661/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d87d72d3cf8faec99fa05ff1b1f54cf5</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Getting the best out of data for open access monograph presses: A case study of UCL Press in the group HuMetricsHSS</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1615139/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:14:45 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study of UCL Press sought to identify the extent to which data available to Open Access (OA) monograph presses can be combined with low-cost analysis tools to provide insight into development and strategy. An additional goal was identifying practical steps that monograph publishers can take to ensure that they make the most of the data they&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1615139"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1615139/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">576fdc91a1269bfb473d3502df8d3c28</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Getting the best out of data for open access monograph presses: A case study of UCL Press</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1612751/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:19:52 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study of UCL Press sought to identify the extent to which data available to Open Access (OA) monograph presses can be combined with low-cost analysis tools to provide insight into development and strategy. An additional goal was identifying practical steps that monograph publishers can take to ensure that they make the most of the data they&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1612751"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1612751/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b32f45ec15bca4b6119792dc92115ed0</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited A journal is a club: A new economic model for  scholarly publishing</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1586232/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:33:09 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new economic model for analysis of scholarly publishing—journal publishing in particular—is proposed that draws on club theory. The standard approach builds on market failure in the private production (by research scholars) of a public good (new scholarly knowledge). In that model publishing is communication, as the dissemination of inf&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1586232"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1586232/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c43a74e3028f6c026c56f4cb4d0e0fa3</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Getting the best out of data for small monograph presses: A case study of UCL press</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1578193/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 08:39:11 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital developments in scholarly publishing are giving rise to new data sources with the potential to provide insight into how OA monographs are being used and to support strategic decision-making by publishers. However, small OA monograph publishers face practical challenges in identifying relevant data, as well as in capturing, managing and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1578193"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1578193/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">15d3e8ca85439aa6af34bebee07f3377</guid>
				<title>Cameron Neylon deposited Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons that Olson can teach us</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1578192/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 08:33:12 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The infrastructure that underpin scholarship and research, including repositories, curation systems, aggregators, indexes and standards are public goods. This means that finding sustainability models to support them is a challenge due to free-loading, where someone who does not contribute to the support of the infrastructure nonetheless gains the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1578192"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1578192/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>