[Tom MosterdParticipant @tommosterd]

This topic aims to facilitate and provide information around business models for Open Access books. What business models are out there for Open Access books? How are these evolving and are there particular challenges that could be addressed to improve these?

 

[Lucy BarnesParticipant @lucybarnes]

There are a couple of in-depth posts that have been published in recent weeks by scholar-led presses discussing their business models in some detail (one of which I co-wrote, for full disclosure!) – they might be of interest to this thread:

• The cost of Open Access books: a publisher writes by Lucy Barnes and Rupert Gatti, 28 May 2020
• We Got the Receipts: The Punctum Books Financial and Activity Report 2016–2019 by Vincent W.J. van Gerven Oei, Eileen Joy, and Dan Rudmann, 7 July 2020

[Vanessa ProudmanParticipant @vanessaproudman]

Since there is quite some diversity in the OA books community, would love to hear more about the financial or business models that support Open Access books other than BPCs from publishers in countries across all corners of Europe and beyond.

OBP does a great job of being transparent about their publishing costs and about their revenue streams in their blog post of May 2020.

Are you a small or large publisher? What financial / business models are you using? And how do they scale, and do they need to? What lesson have your learnt? Please share here.

[Tom GradyParticipant @scholtom]

@COPIM project (Work Package 3) is just putting the finishing touches to a report containing a comprehensive review of extant OA monograph revenue models – think there are about 17 or 18 models we’ve identified. (Some more practical than others, and I think all of them used in some kind of combination). We will hopefully publish the report next week so I’ll add a link to that to this thread if that would be useful?

[Lucy BarnesParticipant @lucybarnes]

Yes please @scholtom!

[Tom GradyParticipant @scholtom]

Hi folks, we just published our (quite large!) report on revenue funding models for OA monographs. So, as promised, you can read and download it for free from here:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4011836

If anyone has questions arising from this report then please do get in touch on here – happy to discuss and keep the conversation going.

 

[Sebastian NordhoffParticipant @snordhoff]

I had a look at @scholtom‘s report. Very nice work. The section on “subscribe-to-open” lists Language Science Press. I am not sure this is 100% correct. LangSci never had closed content, so we could not possibly do a transition, and we can also not threaten to revert back to that. I can see how we ended up there, but the model is slightly different.

We have published our annotated business model here: https://zenodo.org/record/1286972

Our annual reports including revenue and expenditures can be found here: https://userblogs.fu-berlin.de/langsci-press/category/statistics/

 

[Lucy BarnesParticipant @lucybarnes]

A couple more posts on OA books and business models, all (relatively) recently published:

• State of Open Monographs Series: The Economics of Open Access Monographs and part two State of Open Monograph Series: Open access monograph funding, in which Sara Grimme and Charles Watkinson talk to Lara Speicher and Erich van Rijn
• Making OA Monographs More Discoverable, Usable, and Sustainable by John Sherer, discussing the Sustainable History Monograph Pilot (SHMP), which is now in its final year. (My eyebrows were raised by the mention of the author who ‘said they were excited about the prospect of their book being widely available, especially in parts of the world that have historically been under-served by university presses. But they didn’t like the cover template, so they declined to participate.’ !!!)

[Author]

Posts