-
A Critical Examination of the OSTP Memo
- Author(s):
- Dave Ghamandi (see profile)
- Date:
- 2022
- Subject(s):
- Open access publishing, Open access, United States. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Scholarly publishing, Scholarly publishing--Economic aspects, Publishers and publishing, Administrative agencies
- Item Type:
- Blog Post
- Permanent URL:
- https://doi.org/10.17613/ejk2-ys30
- Abstract:
- Open access (OA) takes many forms. It can be the product of voluntary associations that are cooperative and mutually supportive. It can result from the “free market,” where Springer Nature charges an $11,000+ article processing charge (APC) to make a single article OA. It can also be produced through a regulatory-compliance-and-punishment system. The latter is what’s found in the new Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) memo issued on August 25, 2022. The OSTP’s stated aims in the memo give anti-imperialists much to be concerned about, especially as the biden administration previously justified increasing public access to federally-funded research as a way of battling China in a new Cold War. Those of us in the belly of the beast—the u.s. empire—have an obligation to develop, share, and act upon a critical analysis of the OSTP memo. This analysis is rooted in the historical and present-day evidence that the executive branch manages a corporately-controlled state and is not accustomed to giving gifts to the working class. I attempt to explain and predict in this essay.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 1 year ago
- License:
- Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
- Share this:
Open access, open source, open to all
ostp-response-20220912.pdf