-
Laboratories of Extraterritoriality
- Author(s):
- Jenna Foos, Sean Pager
- Date:
- 2021
- Group(s):
- MSU Law Faculty Repository
- Item Type:
- Article
- Permanent URL:
- https://doi.org/10.17613/w69b-3z33
- Abstract:
- With the effective demise of the Alien Tort Statute ("ATS"), state law is widely expected to play an expanded role in international human rights litigation. Commentators have focused on commonlaw tort as the presumptive vehicle for such suits. However, this Article argues that state unfair competition statutes offer an underexplored alternative that is vastly superior. Transnational unfair competition actions are more versatile than common-lawtort less problematic for federal preemption and federalism concerns, and are particularly well-suited to overcome the jurisdictional and procedural hurdles that can hamper other transnational lawsuits. Indeed, unfair competition suits have already successfully targeted supply-chain violations overseas in cases involving both intellectual property infringement and human rights abuses. This Article surveys state unfair competition provisions, categorizes their operative language, and assesses their suitability to support transnational claims. Finally, this Article provides a strategic roadmap to implement supply-chain litigation effectively.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Published as:
- Journal article
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 5 months ago
- License:
- Attribution
- Share this:
Open access, open source, open to all
laboratories.pdf