• The Parol Evidence Rule in Wisconsin: Status in the Law of Contract, Revisited

    Author(s):
    Michael A. Lawrence
    Date:
    1991
    Group(s):
    MSU Law Faculty Repository
    Subject(s):
    Contracts, Jurisprudence, Law, Surveys
    Item Type:
    Legal response
    Tag(s):
    parol evidence, parol, Wis. L. Rev., FacPubs, Other law, Survey
    Permanent URL:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/xcs6-sw84
    Abstract:
    This Comment surveys Wisconsin parol evidence cases decided from 1980 through mid-1991. Drawing upon a 1972 New York University Law Review article for its methodology, the Comment empirically examines whether it is useful to categorize Wisconsin decisions according to the business sophistication (i.e., “status”) of parties to the contract. The Comment concludes that status is important in Wisconsin parol evidence cases, despite the fact that courts rarely mention it as a factor. The data indicate that the nature of the proffered parol evidence is important as well. The Comment suggests that the results of this law-in-action survey are useful to parties, attorneys, and courts alike – to parties and attorneys by improving their odds of prevailing on parol evidence issues, and to courts by giving them additional rationale with which to circumvent or uphold the rigid application of the parol evidence rule.
    Metadata:
    Published as:
    Journal article    
    Status:
    Published
    Last Updated:
    2 years ago
    License:
    Attribution-NonCommercial
    Share this:

    Downloads

    Item Name: pdf facpubs59fulltext.pdf
      Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 6