• Exploratory analysis of indicators for open knowledge institutions: a case study of Australian universities

    Richard Hosking, Chun-Kai Huang (see profile) , Lucy Montgomery, Cameron Neylon, Alkim Ozaygen, Katie Wilson
    Altmetrics, Bibliometrics, Critical university studies, Higher education, Open access, Open scholarship, Open science
    Item Type:
    diversity, open knowledge
    Permanent URL:
    While the movement for open access (OA) has gained momentum in recent years, there remain concerns about the broader commitment to openness in knowledge production and dissemination. Increasingly, universities are under pressure to transform themselves to engage with the wider community and to be more inclusive. Open knowledge institutions (OKIs) provide a framework that encourages universities to act with the principles of openness at their centre; not only should universities embrace digital OA, but also lead actions in cultivating diversity, equity, transparency and positive changes in society. Accordingly, this leads onto questions of whether we can evaluate the progress of OKIs and what are potential indicators for OKIs. As an exploratory study, this article reports on the collection and analysis of a list of potential indicators for OKIs. Data for these indicators are gathered for 43 Australian universities. The results show evidence of large disparities in characteristics such as Indigenous employment and gender equity, and a preference for repository-mediated OA across the Australian universities. These OKI indicators provide high-dimensional and complex signals that can be widely categorised into three groups of diversity, communication and coordination.
    Last Updated:
    2 years ago
    All Rights Reserved
    Share this:


    Item Name:pdf indicators-for-okis_-australia.pdf
     Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 114