-
Arendt versus Ellison on Little Rock: The Role of Language in Political Judgment
- Author(s):
- Meili Steele (see profile)
- Date:
- 2002
- Group(s):
- Frankfurt School Critical Theory, Literary theory, Philosophy, Political Philosophy & Theory
- Item Type:
- Article
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/jyf8-m946
- Abstract:
- Few of Arendt's writings have drawn more criticism from her own supporters than "Reflections on LIttle Rock," in which she opposes the federally mandated desegregation of schools. I take Arendt's comments as a way of opening up problems in her conception of the relationship among political storytelling, plurality and judgment. I do this through a comparison with the work of Ralph Ellison, who responded to her piece. Ellison's differences with Arendt are not just about race and schools but about the proper conception of language in political judgment.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Published as:
- Journal article Show details
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Pub. Date:
- 2002
- Journal:
- Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Demcratic Theory
- Volume:
- 9
- Page Range:
- 184 - 204
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 4 years ago
- License:
- All Rights Reserved
- Share this:
Downloads
Item Name: steele-arendt_versus_ellison_on_little_rock_the-1.pdf
Download View in browser Activity: Downloads: 404