-
By convention or by nature – Melanchthon's criticism of late medieval Ockhamist political thought in the Commentarii in aliquot politicos libros Aristotelis
- Author(s):
- Mads Langballe Jensen (see profile)
- Date:
- 2014
- Subject(s):
- Aristotle, Reformation, Renaissance, Europe, Sixteenth century, Seventeenth century
- Item Type:
- Article
- Tag(s):
- Renaissance and reformation / early modern Europe
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/7pp7-6192
- Abstract:
- The article argues that existing scholarship has missed Melanchthon's central objective in writing the Commentarii in aliquot politicos libros Aristotelis. Rather than merely criticising peasants and radical preachers, Melanchthon sought to refute the Ockhamist political thought of Gabriel Biel and John Mair. Using Aristotle's naturalism within the theological framework of the political order as ordained by God Melanchthon criticised the conventionalist account of the Ockhamists, specifically the principles underlying the case for popular sovereignty or the power of the community over the ruler. Instead he forwarded a theory of politics and constitutional monarchy grounded in natural and positive law.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Published as:
- Journal article Show details
- Pub. Date:
- 2014
- Journal:
- History of Political Thought
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 1
- Page Range:
- 1 - 28
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 5 years ago
- License:
- All Rights Reserved
- Share this:
Downloads
Item Name: by_convention_or_by_nature_melanchthons.pdf
Download View in browser Activity: Downloads: 99
-
By convention or by nature – Melanchthon's criticism of late medieval Ockhamist political thought in the Commentarii in aliquot politicos libros Aristotelis