• "Other minds than ours" – A controversial discussion on the limits and possibilities of comparative psychology in the light of Lloyd Morgan's work

    Author(s):
    Martin Boehnert (see profile) , Christopher Hilbert
    Date:
    2018
    Group(s):
    Animal Studies, Anthropology, Science Studies and the History of Science
    Subject(s):
    Animal studies
    Item Type:
    Article
    Tag(s):
    Comparative Psychology, Cognitive Ethology, Animal behaviour, Lloyd Morgan, Morgan's Canon
    Permanent URL:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M6J38KH1D
    Abstract:
    C. Lloyd Morgan is mostly known for Morgan's canon (1894), still a popular and frequently quoted principle in comparative psychology and ethology. There has been a fair amount of debate on the canon's interpretation, function, and value regarding the research on animal minds, usually referring to it as an isolated principle. In this paper we rather shed light on Morgan's overall scientific program and his vision for comparative psychology. We argue that within his program Morgan identified crucial conceptual, ontological, and methodical issues, that are still fundamental to the current research on animal minds, and we contend that a proper understanding of the canon can only be gained taking it as part of this program. This also highlights a new aspect of his role as one of the " founding fathers " of modern comparative psychology. In order to understand Morgan's program, we briefly outline the historical context in which he began his work on a science of comparative psychology. We will then emphasize to what extent his taxonomy of psychological capacities, the development of his metaphysics for a comparative psychology, and his newly introduced interdisciplinary procedures justify Morgan's distinctive approach to still rather sensitive issues. In doing so, we aim to provide a more comprehensive picture of Morgan's methodological signature. We finally understand his most renown considerations as part of his struggle to ascertain the limits and possibilities of the discipline he contributed to set up, and thus emphasize the need to keep the discussion going, notably on the accessibility of other minds than one's own and on the limits of one's research perspectives.
    Notes:
    This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0211-4.
    Metadata:
    Published as:
    Journal article    
    Status:
    Published
    Last Updated:
    3 months ago
    License:
    All Rights Reserved
    Share this:

    Downloads

    Item Name:pdf hpls-other-minds-than-ours-böhnert-hilbert.pdf
     Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 13