• “Modernity as Imaginary, Modernity as Tool: Is There a Way Forward?” [in Russian: “Modernost’ kak voobrazhaemoe, modernost’ kak instrument: Est’ li dvizhenie vpered?”]

    Author(s):
    Michael David-Fox (see profile)
    Date:
    2016
    Subject(s):
    19th century, 20th century, Russian history, Soviet Union, Theory
    Item Type:
    Article
    Tag(s):
    modernity, interdisciplinary debate
    Permanent URL:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M6VF58
    Abstract:
    NLO discussion: David-Fox's response to the commentaries on “Russian-Soviet Modernity: None, Shared, Alternative, or Entangled?” [in Russian] by 11 anthropologists, literary scholars, political scientists, and historians (Timur Atnashev, Andy Byford, Alexander Etkind, Bruce Grant, Catriona Kelly, Ilya Kalinin, Kirill Kobrin, Stephen Lovell, Alexander Markov, Douglas Rogers, Mark D. Steinberg, Mikhail Velizhev).
    Notes:
    NLO [New Literary Observer], no. 140 (fall 2016): 79-91.
    Metadata:
    Published as:
    Journal article    
    Status:
    Published
    Last Updated:
    4 weeks ago
    License:
    All Rights Reserved

    Downloads

    Item Name: pdf david-fox-nlo-modernity-responses-2016.pdf
      Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 6